(Musical) Anatomy of Female Power
Mar 24, 2024 17:56:24 GMT
Post by Evola As He Is on Mar 24, 2024 17:56:24 GMT
A few years ago, before starting to write the afterword to Anatomie and when I had only read the book four times, I tried to heal the wound that the knowledge that Anatomy was written by a black man can cause in any white man's self-esteem, by observing that almost all the parts of the body which is meticulously and conscientiously dissected in it are to be found, in whole or in part, rather like the members of the body of Osiris, scattered throughout European literature, particularly French literature, from Villon to Henri de Montherlant via Flaubert and Baudelaire. Since then, I have realised that I have misjudged things. What we find in all these white authors is a penetrating "psychological analysis of women.
"Psychological analysis"? What an awful and, above all, inappropriate term. For example, these four lines (see evolaasheis.proboards.com/thread/129/matriarchy-gynaecocracy-current-state?page=5 for the translation)
are anything but analytical. It is a synthetic, immediate transcription of an intuition that the poet had while observing a woman, her attitude, her gestures in an episode of daily life, and which a moralist, in his attempt to define and describe "woman's nature", would translate more or less as follows: the woman is a being by nature fearful, pusilanimous, timorous, wicked. Those who open Anatomy expecting a study of 'woman’s nature' will get little for their pains. Above all, Anatomy is above all a survival manual.
Whatever the powers of observation of our writers, obviously related to their idiosyncrasy, there is nothing in their works, directly or indirectly, about the five pillars of female power, let alone kitchen power. None of the promotional clips to be posted here of the songs that best illustrate the other four, whether visually, lyrically or both, makes the slightest reference, visually or otherwise, to kitchen power either; none, apart from www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMThz7eQ6K0, which has already been mentioned.
Today's women, whether employees or company directors, no longer have the time to cook for - or against - their husbands or partners?
does.
Of course, no one is saying that the artist in question was fully aware of the relevance of the image in question; more generally, no one is saying that the artist is fully aware of the relevance of the images he creates – or, for that matter, that others create – to illustrate the lyrics of his songs. This is not the place to explore the thesis that the artist is a mere medium. What matters – what matters to us –, is that the image exists as an illustration, a thousand times bigger. of a given reality. The image should correspond as closely as possible to the lyrics, which, as far as they are concerned, are usually written by the artist. Unsurprisingly, the choice will be very limited. Not surprisingly either, it may be that some of the exemplary musical works that evince the considerations of a Masculinist were composed by muchos. Still unsurprisingly, the compilation will include very few female singers; in fact, only one, the only one, to my knowledge, who has spilled the beans in public.
Give credit where credit is due, so we'll start with her song, which was a huge hit in 1981, but first it would be good to re-watch a crucial work that has already been mentioned: www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m9m5-n-aP8 - released the following year.
"Psychological analysis"? What an awful and, above all, inappropriate term. For example, these four lines (see evolaasheis.proboards.com/thread/129/matriarchy-gynaecocracy-current-state?page=5 for the translation)
Songeant de poisons et de glaives,
Eprise de poudre et de fer,
N'ouvrant à chacun qu'avec crainte,
Déchiffrant le malheur partout,
Eprise de poudre et de fer,
N'ouvrant à chacun qu'avec crainte,
Déchiffrant le malheur partout,
Whatever the powers of observation of our writers, obviously related to their idiosyncrasy, there is nothing in their works, directly or indirectly, about the five pillars of female power, let alone kitchen power. None of the promotional clips to be posted here of the songs that best illustrate the other four, whether visually, lyrically or both, makes the slightest reference, visually or otherwise, to kitchen power either; none, apart from www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMThz7eQ6K0, which has already been mentioned.
Today's women, whether employees or company directors, no longer have the time to cook for - or against - their husbands or partners?
does.
Of course, no one is saying that the artist in question was fully aware of the relevance of the image in question; more generally, no one is saying that the artist is fully aware of the relevance of the images he creates – or, for that matter, that others create – to illustrate the lyrics of his songs. This is not the place to explore the thesis that the artist is a mere medium. What matters – what matters to us –, is that the image exists as an illustration, a thousand times bigger. of a given reality. The image should correspond as closely as possible to the lyrics, which, as far as they are concerned, are usually written by the artist. Unsurprisingly, the choice will be very limited. Not surprisingly either, it may be that some of the exemplary musical works that evince the considerations of a Masculinist were composed by muchos. Still unsurprisingly, the compilation will include very few female singers; in fact, only one, the only one, to my knowledge, who has spilled the beans in public.
Give credit where credit is due, so we'll start with her song, which was a huge hit in 1981, but first it would be good to re-watch a crucial work that has already been mentioned: www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m9m5-n-aP8 - released the following year.